MANSOQ Knowledge
← Knowledge library

RCM & insurance

Publish a fully guarded fictional organization-master package

Follow the observed successful one-row Clinic package with retained source bytes, separate reviewers and a current server receipt.

Current source · Source reviewed; exact stated local synthetic UI/API continuation and independent readback observed · 12 min read

Before you begin

1. Independently verify the retained Clinic source

Use a separate synthetic Clinic estate with no existing RCM candidates. The maker uploaded the actual mock PDF through the normal multipart endpoint. Its different existing Clinic Facility Admin inspected both pages and independent stored-byte SHA-256 proof, wrote a scope-limited note, checked the attestation and used Verify stored file.

In a separate native Clinic estate, the existing Clinic Facility Admin reviewed both fictional PDF pages and independent stored-byte SHA-256 proof, supplied a scoped note, checked the attestation and used Verify stored file. Uploader was the different existing root operator.1234
Independently attest retained Clinic source contents · 2026-10-18Actual audited MANSOQ production frontend in isolated synthetic training. In a separate native Clinic estate, the existing Clinic Facility Admin reviewed both fictional PDF pages and independent stored-byte SHA-256 proof, supplied a scoped note, checked the attestation and used Verify stored file. Uploader was the different existing root operator.
  1. Open retained private document: Inspect the stored contents and metadata.
  2. Scoped review note: Record actual inspected evidence and its limitations.
  3. Contents attestation: Only after actual inspection.
  4. Verify stored file: Normal server verification retains separate reviewer identity.
The Clinic source row is Verified after actual independent UI review; independent stored-byte readback matches the retained mock PDF. The verified flag is local content integrity, not real signed authority.12
Verify the separate Clinic review result · 2026-10-18Actual audited MANSOQ production frontend in isolated synthetic training. The Clinic source row is Verified after actual independent UI review; independent stored-byte readback matches the retained mock PDF. The verified flag is local content integrity, not real signed authority.
  1. Verified saved: Separate reviewer and actual retained bytes were independently confirmed.
  2. Exact register: Use this source ID in the isolated Clinic only.

2. Approve the exact dated draft as a different person

The maker created one explicitly fictional organization master with 2026 effective dates and the retained mock source, then used the normal draft→In review transition. The different existing Clinic reviewer named the exact model, external ID, current lock and Approved target and supplied the review reason.

The distinct existing Clinic reviewer names emr.RcmOrganization, the exact external ID, its current lock token and target Approved, plus a scope-limited reason. Author requested In review through the normal API. This frame shows the fields; the transition control is below its lower edge.1234
Approve the exact row with its current lock · 2026-10-18Actual audited MANSOQ production frontend in isolated synthetic training. The distinct existing Clinic reviewer names emr.RcmOrganization, the exact external ID, its current lock token and target Approved, plus a scope-limited reason. Author requested In review through the normal API. This frame shows the fields; the transition control is below its lower edge.
  1. Exact model and row: Act on the reviewed configuration row.
  2. Current lock token: A stale save is refused.
  3. Approved target: Approval freezes content; it does not make the engine select the row.
  4. Independent review reason: The author and approver remain separate.

3. Confirm approval without inferring activation

The actual UI Approve/transition saved Approved with a new lock and named separate approver. Independent readback confirms author and approver differ. Approved freezes content and is not engine selectable. No clinical, price, benefit or entitlement rule was activated.

Actual Clinic reviewer UI Approve/transition saved the fictional organization as Approved, with a new lock and named separate approver. The engine may not select an Approved row; no active clinical configuration is created.123
Confirm separate reviewer approval · 2026-10-18Actual audited MANSOQ production frontend in isolated synthetic training. Actual Clinic reviewer UI Approve/transition saved the fictional organization as Approved, with a new lock and named separate approver. The engine may not select an Approved row; no active clinical configuration is created.
  1. Normal transition action: The supported state machine was used.
  2. Saved Approved state: Content is frozen; this is not Active.
  3. Named separate reviewer: Independent readback confirms author and approver differ.

4. Run the maker’s exact server qualification

As the maker, open Publish package and label this fictional candidate. Run Validate configuration. The observed check passed for exactly one reviewed setting, with actual retained bytes, named approval and dates; its server receipt expires after 15 minutes and is bound to the unchanged candidate/evidence.

The maker UI server checks passed for exactly one reviewed organization-master setting using actual retained fictional bytes, approval and dates. The empty reviewer-code field remains required. Qualification lasts 15 minutes and must be rerun after any configuration/evidence change.123
Confirm exact server qualification passed · 2026-10-18Actual audited MANSOQ production frontend in isolated synthetic training. The maker UI server checks passed for exactly one reviewed organization-master setting using actual retained fictional bytes, approval and dates. The empty reviewer-code field remains required. Qualification lasts 15 minutes and must be rerun after any configuration/evidence change.
  1. Exactly one reviewed setting: Success is scoped to this candidate.
  2. Expiry and change binding: The receipt cannot validate a different or changed candidate.
  3. Independent one-use approval still needed: The code is private and was not included in this screenshot.

5. Use a separate reviewer’s private one-use approval and publish

The existing independent reviewer issued a facility/action/field-bound create/approved_by code through the normal product endpoint. The maker entered that private code and used the actual UI Publish control. At the observed 1280px viewport the dialog footer lay below view; keyboard activation of its enabled focused control completed the normal UI submission. No code appears in published screenshots and no guard was bypassed.

Actual maker UI Publish saved immutable sequence 1 with a distinct existing Clinic approver and current server-issued qualification. The one-use reviewer code was issued normally and never included in screenshots. No gate was open in this separate one-row Clinic candidate; this says nothing about the protected Polyclinic gates.1234
Verify actual guarded package publication · 2026-10-18Actual audited MANSOQ production frontend in isolated synthetic training. Actual maker UI Publish saved immutable sequence 1 with a distinct existing Clinic approver and current server-issued qualification. The one-use reviewer code was issued normally and never included in screenshots. No gate was open in this separate one-row Clinic candidate; this says nothing about the protected Polyclinic gates.
  1. Immutable sequence 1: A correction must become a new package.
  2. Different publisher and approver: Normal dual control remained enforced.
  3. Server qualification reference: The package binds the actual successful candidate check.
  4. Candidate-scoped gates: No open gates in this Clinic candidate does not close another facility’s gates.

6. Inspect the immutable sequence and precise contents

The UI saved sequence 1 with distinct publisher and approver and a current server qualification reference. Inspect shows exactly one frozen Approved organization-master row. Its Signed contract label is a local mock evidence classification, never an actual executed agreement or licence. This package provides no clinical benefits, tariff, patient entitlement, insurer authority, external integration or government/customer UAT.

The package inspection names exactly one frozen Approved organization-master row and its local mock Signed contract classification. It establishes no actual signed agreement, licence, tariff, benefit, entitlement, medical rule, live payer connection or government/customer UAT. Approved remains not engine selectable.12
Inspect the exact frozen package contents · 2026-10-18Actual audited MANSOQ production frontend in isolated synthetic training. The package inspection names exactly one frozen Approved organization-master row and its local mock Signed contract classification. It establishes no actual signed agreement, licence, tariff, benefit, entitlement, medical rule, live payer connection or government/customer UAT. Approved remains not engine selectable.
  1. Frozen Approved row: Inspect exact rows and states, not just a package badge.
  2. Cut-time versus current gates: These are separate observations.

Source evidence

References are pinned to the private MANSOQ source repository. Repository access is required to open these links.